procedural principle of party's equality in litigation status 當(dāng)事人訴訟地位平等的程序原理
aimed at the administrative litigation status quo as well as its defects, the last but two part provides some institutional constructions of the litigable principle in china, among which the insurance of judicial impendence and building administrative case law are of most importance 考慮到我國(guó)目前行政訴訟的現(xiàn)狀和不足,確保司法獨(dú)立和建立行政判例制度是行政可訴性原則在中國(guó)制度設(shè)置的最重要的內(nèi)容。
the research of this article finds the following suggestions helpful for china to better employ the special and differential treatment provisions in the wto dispute settlement . first, considering the different stages in the process of the wto dispute settlement, china should try its best to solve disputes within the consultation stage by using the additional time and means provided by these provisions; use the provisions in the legal stage to strengthen its litigation status and better position itself against those stronger countries; and use them in the implementation stage to win special and differential treatments in the matters of the reasonable period of time for implementation and the way as well 本文經(jīng)過(guò)研究,對(duì)我國(guó)應(yīng)如何利用爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制中的特殊和差別待遇條款的對(duì)策提出以下建議:首先,從爭(zhēng)端解決程序的階段來(lái)看,在磋商階段,我國(guó)應(yīng)利用這些條款所提供的時(shí)間和方式空間,盡可能在這一階段內(nèi)解決爭(zhēng)端;在法律階段應(yīng)利用特殊和差別待遇條款加強(qiáng)自己的訴訟地位,改善與優(yōu)勢(shì)國(guó)家的力量對(duì)比;在執(zhí)行階段,我國(guó)也要利用有關(guān)條款,力爭(zhēng)在執(zhí)行的合理期限和方式上得到特殊和差別待遇。